@DanaRohrabacher can you please tell me from where you are getting your info re climate science?
@donpedrodepedo During Clinton years getting fed research grant was made easy for those proving GWarming theory. now under Obama same game
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher but what is motivation for both sides? Obama uses gw to create more taxes to generate revenue? -
@donpedrodepedo motives not important. accuracy of argument & significance of policy being advocated should be focus of decision making -
@DanaRohrabacher but if criticism of gw proponents is that of cherry picking and modifying data (not interested in sound science) isn't... -
@donpedrodepedo that cherry picking language is arrogantly used 2 draw attention away from specific examples of inaccuracy, fraud & error.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher makes sense for scientists to follow pack- get money for more research. Just want to know what each side has to gain/lose -
@DanaRohrabacher (questions not to be read as sarcasm. Tho differing opinions, much appreciated the opportunity for discussion)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.