@SunnyNeutrino iUr name calling undermines Ur science. Where specifically am I wrong? 16 yrs of flat temps? Predictions dead wrong?
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
You can start with this: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 …
@DanaRohrabacher1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SunnyNeutrino
@SunnyNeutrino thanks 4 NYT article, similar 2 ominous global cooling warnings 40 yrs ago and 20 yr bogus predictions of major tempt jump2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
I respectfully suggest that instead of a 40 year timeframe, you shift to 40,000 years, commensurate with modern humans.
@DanaRohrabacher1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SunnyNeutrino
@SunnyNeutrino 40,000 yr old ice cores later, for how about 1850s, which MMGW claims a 1 degree C since then & it is due to CO2, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher MMGW is Making Middle Grades Work. Let's move on. 40,000 years provides a more robust dataset than 150 years, agreed?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SunnyNeutrino I will present my two issues for Ur comment and
D then we will proceed with an open Bach & forth ...then U present two issues
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.