@FastBigDog Ur refusal 2 comment on first items put up 4 discussion indicates Ur intent & Ur closed mind. I offered 2 engaged, U plaed games
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher I'm not refusing to comment on it at all, my comment is that scientific opinion changes are more data becomes available.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FastBigDog
@FastBigDog U R dishonest. u had no intent of honest discussion. No need to waste time with such a poser2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher I am proposing we write letters to top scientists in your state: doesn't get any more honest or transparent than that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FastBigDog
@FastBigDog Discuss issues, quote who U want. exchanging quotes from PhDs not valuable.Y U so afraid of open discussion?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher Quotes from PhD's not valuable??? Oh really? These are what as known as subject matter experts. This clearly is the prob.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FastBigDog
@FastBigDog U had chance & chickened out. getting quotes from PhDs & throwing them at each other not as good as logical issue discussion3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher U see, when u have bad data, u can't have a good discussion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FastBigDog
@FastBigDog quit wasting time. U have no intention of discussing significant issues that R part of GWarming debate.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher but u seem completely incapable of grasping the very simple goal of bringing in experts to provide facts. I feel sorry 4 U1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@FastBigDog After such cowardly display of dodging an issue discussion one would think U might have been shamed out of name calling. Nope
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.