@FastBigDog let's see, U ignored question about false tipping point claim & about 1850s fraudulent baseline. Ur answer is no answer, right
@FastBigDog Ur refusal 2 comment on first items put up 4 discussion indicates Ur intent & Ur closed mind. I offered 2 engaged, U plaed games
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I'm not refusing to comment on it at all, my comment is that scientific opinion changes are more data becomes available. -
@FastBigDog U R dishonest. u had no intent of honest discussion. No need to waste time with such a poser -
@DanaRohrabacher I am proposing we write letters to top scientists in your state: doesn't get any more honest or transparent than that. -
@FastBigDog Discuss issues, quote who U want. exchanging quotes from PhDs not valuable.Y U so afraid of open discussion? -
@DanaRohrabacher Quotes from PhD's not valuable??? Oh really? These are what as known as subject matter experts. This clearly is the prob. -
@FastBigDog U had chance & chickened out. getting quotes from PhDs & throwing them at each other not as good as logical issue discussion -
@DanaRohrabacher I'm not chickening out from anything but it is impossible to have a fact-based discussion without good facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Let's do this: I propose U and I jointly write letters to the top 20 univ's in CA. Let's ask their climate PhD's 4 recommenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher If U truly want to best serve the ppl of CA, don't U owe it to them to listen to the best minds in the field today?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.