Oh, and this just in, @DanaRohrabacher (R) California, you are a complete & utter idiot for attempting to deny this: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?hp&target=comments&_r=1&#commentsContainer …
@FastBigDog OK start with Ur explanation: "peer reviewed" papers predicting major temp jump instead of 16 stable yrs temps(Hansen admitted)
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Thank you for the reply. No need for quote on "peer reviewed" though, as this is not an explanation, rather a methodology. -
@FastBigDog 2 decades ago MMGW scientists(including Hansen)screamed warnings of tipping point, major temp jump within ten years. NOPE!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I think this may be part of the problem, a fundamental lack of understanding of what science is and how it works. -
@FastBigDog Yes, I am not impressed with credentials or oration about process if facts in question R dismissed rather than dealt with
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Unlike politics, science is based on data, facts & reason. While rarely absolute, it is the best basic for decision makingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.