Oh, and this just in, @DanaRohrabacher (R) California, you are a complete & utter idiot for attempting to deny this: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?hp&target=comments&_r=1&#commentsContainer …
@FastBigDog Oh more name calling rather than specific disagreement. GW alarmists make themselves look bad by such anti-intellect tactics
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Highly ironic that the guy who is ignoring overwhelming scientific research is playing the anti-intellectual card. -
@FastBigDog that is because I don't call names & deal directly with points raised by those who disagree, rather than call names & dismiss
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I'd love to have a fact-based discussion with U on this topic, but based on ur viewpoint, I didn't think u were up to it. -
@FastBigDog 1850s used as baseline to determine Global Warming. that happens to been the bottom of 300 yr tempt decline. isn't that bogus? -
@DanaRohrabacher I do sincerely want to understand how U draw UR conclusions tho, as the scientific literature simply does not support them. -
@FastBigDog I always like a good discussion, I learn a lot. When I am wrong I change my opinion, which no one ever needs to apologize about -
@DanaRohrabacher As do I, which is why I am so puzzled that U struggle w/ this-CO2 levels are rising. This is a fact: http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/ -
@FastBigDog First, tell me why warming baseline of 1850s acceptable, when it was bottom of 300 yr decline in temp. then discuss CO2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher If U R, my apologies and I welcome your first piece of credible, peer-reviewed data.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.