You are suggesting by your posts that people would just be healed. In the real world, some people can't be "healed", and that is obviously a touchy subject. They may also want to emulate their real life in fantasty.
-
-
Leaving the reader to assume your stance is either: - Your character cannot be disabled because we'll just wish it away OR - Your character has no accessibility options open to them OR - You can't play a disabled character because that's an agenda, and they're not welcome here
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
You've stated "disability is not a culture", however people with disabilities have an inate group identity, by sharing common traits and experiences they have a culture. Surfers get to have a culture Stoners get to have a culture But no, not disability.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @bardzilla_ @Hag_Heroes
The surfers have the culture, not the board or the waves. The drug users have the culture, not the drugs or the bongs. The people affected by disability have a culture. The disability doesn't.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Eliminating or reducing disability does not imply reducing, eliminating or diminishing culture in any way. YOU ARE NOT YOUR DISABILITY.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
You're misidentifying "Identity" with "Culture". Culture is a shared experience/history of a specific group or groups. Identifying themselves as disabled is something completely different. If you're gonna throw around definitions; try to learn them first.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
You're misidentifying 'disability' with 'person affected by disability' by identifying with your condition.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @DungeonDining @theredjaynerd und
I don't really care if I used the word 'identify' in a way that suits you. YOU ARE NOT YOUR DISABILITY. That's the point at issue here.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Don't get it twisted. The point is accessibilty for characters inside a fantasy world.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Not so. The issue is the notion of accessibility within a *specific* fantasy world, one where disability is curable and accessibility as described would be implausible, to say the least.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
Hey @KitFez I noticed you’re a SpecialEffect advocate and this guy is removing a disability friendly environment in D&D by saying people should just wish their disabilities away. As you’re likely going to know about about either of these things, can you let me know if you agree?
-
-
Antwort an @DaggerMcTimbers @DungeonDining und
D&D is a rich, diverse world in which distinct identity is vital, and for many, disability *is* an aspect of identity; it's something that has informed/driven some or even much of their life. It's not on any DM to say a character's identity cannot be as the player wants.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 9 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @KitAlexHarrison @DaggerMcTimbers und
If a character is eg. unable to walk because the player wants them to be in a wheelchair, then that's a valid character design. I think there's arguments for certain disabilities/ailments not being a problem, but as D&D is group storytelling that is for the group to agree on.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 7 Gefällt mir - Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
, fundraiser. Internal Comms Coordinator
Views
She/Her