It they would follow our laws. We would not have any problems due to illegal immigration.
-
-
-
Asylum seekers are trying to follow a well-established process of legal migration. Try again.
-
If it's legal then I'm okay with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, if less people were coming in illegally, and if so many children weren't being kidnapped by traffickers that requires so much verification, the immigration courts wouldn't be so clogged.
-
I hope your home-schooling curriculum includes the lesson on the right to due process.
-
Probably more than yours did. And it will focus on free speech, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms, unlike most schools today.
-
Thx for the assumption. Re your orig post- so it's ok for those migrating the "right way" (eg seeking asylum via processing) to suffer bc of the backlog from those who, though posed no danger to society, are being prosecuted for doing it illegally? I don't get it. ???
-
It would be more appropriate to put those who filed as refugees first in processing. Those who came illegally, should be put into the process after the refugee vetting is complete. And how do you know that they pose no danger? Are you psychic?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They only deserve to be deported
-
Asylum seekers who have been denied due process cannot be said to have done anything illegal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.