DORA

@DORAssessment

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Putting science into the assessment of research. Initiated by .

Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @DORAssessment

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @DORAssessment

  1. prije 6 sati

    The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants Read:

    Poništi
  2. prije 6 sati

    Routine reminder: Do not use journal-based metrics as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Sign DORA:

    Poništi
  3. prije 6 sati
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    If you know of exemplary research assessment methods that could provide inspiration and ideas for research institutes, funders, journals, professional societies, or researchers, please contact DORA.

    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    The application process for Long-Term Fellowships emphasizes the most important outcomes and impact of the applicant’s work rather than where it is published and specifically states that journal impact factors should not be provided. More:

    Poništi
  6. 1. velj

    WHAT: Talk with about the postdoc to faculty transition WHEN: Feb. 12 at 1:00 PM EST REGISTER : It's free, online, and everyone is welcome to join!

    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    Pour les chercheurs: Le cas échéant, citer la littérature primaire dans laquelle les observations ont été rapportées en premier plutôt que les articles de synthèse afin d’en attribuer le mérite à bon escient.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    "... researchers to present their most important contributions to science in brief narratives, rather than as lists of publications." Great, a concrete step moving towards

    Poništi
  9. 31. sij

    The is testing a new, standardized CV structure. All researchers applying for project funding in biology and medicine in spring 2020 will be part of the pilot project “SciCV”." Read:

    Poništi
  10. 31. sij
    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    What meetings or conference sessions about , research culture, and responsible metrics are you looking forward to in 2020?

    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    Für Wissenschaftler: Bezweifeln Sie Bewertungspraktiken, die sich unangemessenerweise auf Journal Impact Factors stützen, und empfehlen Sie „Best Practices“, die sich auf den Wert und die Bedeutung spezifischer Forschungsleistungen konzentrieren.

    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    Join via Zoom us for our next community interview on February 12 at 1pmEST, with . We’ll discuss NIH grants, institutional bias and what’s needed to land a faculty position. Register here, it's free:

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Araştırmacılar için: Fon kararı veren, işe alan, görev süresini belirleyen ya da yükselme kararları alan komitelerde yer aldığınızda yayın sayısına dayanan ölçevler yerine bilimsel içeriğe dayalı değerlendirmeler yapın.

    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    Institutions and funders can use the Hong Kong Principles to reward and recognize scholars for behavior that contributes to trustworthy research. The principles were developed as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity. More:

    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    Araştırmacılar için: Fon kararı veren, işe alan, görev süresini belirleyen ya da yükselme kararları alan komitelerde yer aldığınızda yayın sayısına dayanan ölçevler yerine bilimsel içeriğe dayalı değerlendirmeler yapın.

    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    Research assessment practices that rely on citation counts & impact factors may inadvertently discourage academics from pursuing explorative, novel research approaches. Wang & colleagues investigated the relationship between novelty, impact, and time More:

    Poništi
  18. 29. sij

    3 themes run through DORA: ⭐eliminate the use of journal-based metrics in funding, appointment, & promotion considerations; ⭐assess research on its own merits ⭐capitalize on opportunities provided by online publication Sign DORA:

    Poništi
  19. 29. sij

    . developed a checklist to help departments improve equity in faculty hiring. Find more info about it in her perspective:

    Poništi
  20. 28. sij

    Para pesquisadores: Desafie as práticas de avaliação que usam inadequadamente o fator de impacto promovendo e ensinando melhores práticas centradas no valor e influência dos resultados e produtos específicos de pesquisa.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·