All life even includes the unborn, right?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @tajacobson11
I’m pro choice, and I won’t debate that. If you disagree, that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @tajacobson11
That’s a false equivalency. I’m sure you’ve taken part in all the circular arguments to that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLiamDorris
It’s not a false equivalency at all. You said all life. But you didn’t mean all life. I got it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tajacobson11
Sorry. Pro-Choice. Those “unborn” lives are the mother’s lives until they’re born and can be sustained. You already know all the arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLiamDorris
That’s a strange argument. Not sure that it means anything at all. Except it’s not really a life until after it’s born. There’s our disagreement. Until a baby survives an abortion then there goes that argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tajacobson11
See my latest tweet. You really derailed a good point that I had. Admittedly, I used wording that easily was taken out of context. If we’re going to talk about it, let’s rock.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It was an excellent point, just stated poorly. But I understand how you got there. It’s a reminder that I need to be precise about wording. I deserved that gut check.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.