I still wonder how the rocket portion will operate on liquified air, instead of lox. It’s going to need to produce a whole lot more of it than it would need lox. It takes a lot of energy to compress that air just to get the 21% oxygen.
-
-
-
It doesn't liquify the air, unless that's changed, but they do need to compress it to 140 atmospheres.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's finally happening. This means it'll only be another 20 years before they test it...
-
Such seems to usually be the situation, yet let's hope that
@SpaceX has lit a fire under everyone's gluteus maximus to get moving.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wish them nothing but success, but it seems like 10 million Euro and 50 million pounds is about enough development money for some PowerPoint slides and maybe a slick 3D animation.
-
Nah SpaceX developed the Falxon 1 with just 50ish Million or so (in the first year) And its "just" an engine and not a whole rocket
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, ESA is seperated from the EU.
- 5 more replies
-
-
-
Even if Skylon never happens, SABRE will be great - when it's ready. Replacing strap-on boosters (or maybe the entire first stage) with SABRE-based engines would be a HUGE benefit, and make the payload penalty for reusability that much lower.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could the SABRE cut down intercontinental passenger travel continental time by like a factor of ten? I can't help but imagine a suborbital flight path would be crazy fast- baring $$$
-
I would Google what any of this means but I don’t have two weeks to do so.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.