We don’t need fancy terms like “salience landscape”. If we understand simple words like “seeing” properly. We are searching for what we have in new places, and we are just cluttering the language.
-
-
To foster a conversation: it looks (:D) to me like Vervaeke is using a phrase like "salience landscape" to help unpack a proverb like "he who has ears to hear, let him hear," (salience soundscape amirite) precisely because the "simple" words are so rich, and our modern ears /
-
That makes sense. Again, I am not against doing things with words. I am more concerned another tendency, which is a combination of (a) hoarding technical terms and (b) letting those terms shield us from concrete reality (e.g., "that's just 'salience landscape'. I get it.")
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
so empoverished, that we actually need to unpack religious symbols as best we can in propositional language in order to convince ourselves that there is value in them. Who is this "we"? Afaics, it's our divided culture. Perhaps I could get
@Malcolm_Ocean to chime in here, but / - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.