We don’t need fancy terms like “salience landscape”. If we understand simple words like “seeing” properly. We are searching for what we have in new places, and we are just cluttering the language.
-
-
Replying to @DGozli
Agreed, why use "salience landscape" when you can just say "attention schema"? ;-)
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
because one is in the sensory system and the other is part of the cognitive structure of the brain perhaps haha and attention can't be made into a schema either really
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Auxiliary_Valve @DGozli1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Well looks like i'm wrong then
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @Auxiliary_Valve @macterra
I took @macterra’s tweet to cleverly criticize the “why not use my words, instead of theirs?” which could operate beneath the surface, and we should be aware of it.
7:09 PM - 9 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.