We don’t need fancy terms like “salience landscape”. If we understand simple words like “seeing” properly. We are searching for what we have in new places, and we are just cluttering the language.
-
-
I guess it's OK if you're being poetic. But as someone who is studying psychology, a term like that is going backwards and doesn't really make any sense too in a functional system
-
I agree. We should distinguish between adding a term to our toolbox permanently vs. showing a term for clarification (temporarily$ and taking it away, i.e., poetically adding to the meaning of our simple, ordinary words
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I mean if we're saying "seeing" as vision. If seeing refers to something philosophical, then that.changes things a lot
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.