At this point, most of the disagreements btw empiricist psychological scientists and I can be summarized w regard to the place of critique in science: I believe critique should not be absorbed into the set of “scientific activities”. It deserves to stand and breathe on its own.
Yes. I gave a talk today at a “behavioral science” business firm, after which i got the response: isn’t what you’re talking about just good science? Communicating a critical perspective is itself challenging.
-
-
It's a while culture of equating scientific knowledge with truth that we are challenging.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.