David G. Rand

@DG_Rand

Prof of Management Science & Brain & Cognitive Sciences . Studies cooperation; intuition vs deliberation; misinformation; social media; signaling; religion.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @DG_Rand

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @DG_Rand

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    17. stu 2019.

    🚨Working paper alert!🚨 "Understanding and reducing the spread of misinformation online" We introduce a behavioral intervention (accuracy salience) & show in surveys+field exp w >5k Twitter users that it increases quality of news sharing 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 9 sati

    Another Facebook veteran joins , which will use digital marketing to the end of preventing Trump's reelection. A thread on 's journey to joining:

    Poništi
  3. prije 6 sati

    Why don't the parties do their earliest primaries in the states that are maximally swing-y? Wouldn't that be most diagnostic about which candidate would win the generals?

    Poništi
  4. prije 10 sati

    Another benefit of working papers - the ability to access your *published* paper when the APA journal website is so messed up that you can't get the official copy

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for the intergroup compromise "at least in this [context] – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism"

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Incentives are against doing long term research outside academia (6 month - 1 year product cycles are norm). Incentives are against doing immediately useful research in academia (can't publish simple methods that solve problems up to 90%). Do what you like, but tradeoffs exist.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    What are all the "solutions" to misinformation on social media you've heard? Even the silly/impractical/unlikely to work ones.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    How could you *not* like this? People overestimate what % of their friends/followers would like or comment on their content if they saw it in their feed — which means they also underestimate the size of their audience.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    1/ New preprint with and We were interested in whether children in the US (4 to 8 years old) expect leaders to be more like high-ranking individuals in dominance hierarchies or like those in prestige-based hierarchies.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    TAKE A LOOK: Lucid provided survey data to for this insightful look at how social media users are distinguishing between accurate and inaccurate content.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Do middle-schoolers benefit from remembering their earlier errors? New paper from Abbey Loehr, me and Adults are more likely to correct errors that they can recall, but children may have difficulties recalling their prior errors . . .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    My lab is looking for research assistants for the summer! We study cooperation in children, adults and animals and do lots of work outside. See ad attached and link to application here:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    No direct backfire effects, but evidence of what you might call spillover backfire effects for other beliefs

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    🚨New paper alert!🚨 In Judgement & Decision Making "Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise" W/ 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World Our book for popular audiences explains how to spot and refute misinformation, particularly in the form of statistics, machine learning, dataviz, etc. Coming on August 4th. Now on Amazon:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Our collaborators, and of and discuss the role behavior plays in the epidemic. ‘Nudges,’ then, can also be the solution. Keheala’s feature phone is at the forefront of this approach in the battle to

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    New preprint /w In 2 experiments we studied how US adults updated their beliefs about the truth/falsity of real-world political claims given noisy but informative evidence. Some comments on what we found. 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Finally out! Voters' feelings toward politicians hardly shift when they find out they are being lied to half the time: They Might be a Liar but They’re My Liar: Source Evaluation and the Prevalence of Misinformation

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij
    Poništi
  21. 26. sij

    We are hiring up to 3 post-docs interested in misinformation or meta-cognition - review starting Feb 1. Please apply!! Looking for wide range of backgrounds: eg psych, computational social science, poli sci, comm, econ, comp sci - DM with qs. Share/RT appreciated!

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·