@CurlOfGradient that's a reasonable boundary for the term "aesthetics", but there would still be a need for other term for predictive model
-
-
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@CurlOfGradient terminal and instrumental utility are distinct, but we need both to reason about the world2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Right, but aesthetics is just a favorable/unfavorable reaction to stimuli. Whether or not you find X favorably stimulating >1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@The_Lagrangian > is not contingent on whether having such a reaction works out well for you later on.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient that seems to be a rewording of what I said- I think we may be in agreement1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Probably. 140 characters is too short to get across points.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient would you agree that, say, a candy bar would be something that could be described as "you like this" and "it is bad"?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Yes. I find it fundamentally aesthetically pleasing, but it might not be in line with other goals to eat one at the moment.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@The_Lagrangian But I wouldn't say it's bad aesthetically. It's good aesthetically by virtue of my liking it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient@The_Lagrangian If you like something as much as something else, they both have the same aesthetic value?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@arslibertatis @The_Lagrangian I'd say so. If indiff. between X and Y, then equal. But prefs change over time so it might not be true later.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.