@CurlOfGradient Great, my estimate is < 10^12 bits, let's say 10^18 just to be *absurdly* conservative.
-
-
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory My 10^80 estimate is from moving each atom in the universe, after they have condensed out of the quark-gluon plasma, one unit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@MoralOfStory To say nothing of moving two atoms at once. The positions would have to be *absurdly* correlated before to reduce it by much.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient I feel like I should extract a bet before disclosing my strategy ;)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@CurlOfGradient take the program that generates all universes, add a predicate that searches the output for e.g. i7 CPUs2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient I actually believed this for much more complicated reasons, but this proof is certainly shorter.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory Of course, this only picks out the first universe you find an i7 processor in, so you only know you've found one Earth.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@MoralOfStory You'd still need some other way if you want to find *our Earth*.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient I think I have enough spare bits to then run a search on that universe's twitter for this conversation.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@MoralOfStory Possible confounding factor: Boltzmann CPUs running Boltzmann Twitter.
-
-
Replying to @CurlOfGradient
@CurlOfGradient Some other day I will tweet my general anti-boltzmann argument :) but until then, we can just expect many many i7's...0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.