tbh if I have a big red button on my lawn that says “DO NOT TOUCH” and it’s connected to some buried dynamite, I shouldn’t be responsible for any casualties because (a) it was on my property and (b) it *said* not to touch it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
You: Ok, we can create a utopia if we just sacrifice the symmetry and mathematical beauty of these few laws, for literally no other downsides. Me: *sweating*
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Traps are pretty bad generally. Also the dungeon owner is probably strictly liable for the monsters.
-
You could probably summarize my entire life trajectory by that last tweet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Attractive Nuisance only works in most jurisdictions if you're a child. There are broader general protections afforded (even to trespassers) in general premises liability laws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.