10 million for a population of 350 million? That doesn’t sound like it’ll make any difference
Top Harvard epidemiologist tells @ChrisCuomo the federal government ought to manufacture 10 million or more rapid home tests, which he says could be key to defeating coronavirus. https://cnn.it/3mtjnkm pic.twitter.com/m03EOXL2gx
-
-
-
Was thinking same thing. Would think we’ll need far more than 10M. Especially since people who test positive would likely need more than 1 test to test later on to see when negative.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s a good idea it’s not a hard test to perform. However, there’s many people that would conceal a + result bc they don’t want to quarantine. Salons and bars, ya know?
-
Doesn’t need to be everyone. Just enough to stop transmission chains. If half the people ignore their results - that’s still have the transmission chains stopped and R falls far below 1 and outbreaks can dramatically be reduced.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If he can't do testings , he can distribute 100 million vaccines by the end of the year , what about cotton swabs and syringes ?pic.twitter.com/aNoVyk9nC5
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fredo’s Funhouse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The federal government aught to do several things but when you have a POTUS that doesn't care; a gop majority that won't play out a Democratic process, we won't be getting anywhere.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seems *testing* has been taken off the table completely, bc "science doesn't know", unless it's just for the WH admin, science knows there. Oh and science knows about vaccines. But nothing else.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.