I mean.. if you get rid of the ads why would they host it?
-
-
-
Who profits then? Just the American people, right?


Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
&& yet we got Bernie and Tulsi supporters arguing about whether the chicken or the egg came first when what we should be doing is uplifting both Bernie AND Tulsi.
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Cullen, I'm all for campaign finance reform (especially in lieu of ousting corporate funded dark money PACs from their atrocious advertising propaganda) - but it's 2019 my friend, Bernie is a bit off base if he thinks Americans watch television let alone "commercials".
#YangGangpic.twitter.com/zhO2bVnK13
-
I’m pretty sure Americans do, especially those of us who vote.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The English and French Canadian leadership debates held this week were 2 hours, 100% commercial free. Only break was transitioning from 1 moderator to the next, and was segmented by issues. Clearly good for overall flow.
-
I adore the method of debate which the UK/Canada (& other EU States) hold their commercial free platforms that allow candidates to speak for 30 minutes to 2 hours directly to the people. America is a Circus of Capitalism-On-Display w/ 30 seconds to talk & 1 minute Pepsi Ads.

- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
This is such a beautiful interview.
@JohnStossel asks@TulsiGabbard difficult questions without the bad faith "gotcha" questions that most Main Screm Media interviewers do. I wish the conversation lasted longer. It was such a treat to watch them talk.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVvYH6Kkj_s … -
*Main Scream Media
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.