Cú Chulainn

Sibel, tell me exactly on what basis are you making your defamation claims against me and my colleagues?

1- Junk is a factual assessment ; 2- Unless you are in a place like Saudi Arabia, or, Turkmenistan, professional assessment does not equal 'defemation' 3- views on junk sites not worth elaboration l. Now ta ta- go promote 'D' party agenda & Intercept in a junkie manner.

Sibel, you are implying myself or @VanessaBeeley are not journalists, which is untrue. That is defamation.

So funny. Obviously not literate in legal areas either. There are 10000s of junk blog sites out on the net- and as an editor- founder of a news org, as the president-director of the only NS whistleblower organization, as an analyst for 2+ decade, I make informed assessment on ...

Dear Sibel, can you provide one example of a seriously flawed article on 21st century wire? I'll check it out fir accuracy, best Piers

Another good example: check out the founder' bio. Search him all over the net. And see if you can find anything that establishes him as geopolitical analyst (education, work experience, language, travel...)- all sthe of-claimed. Nothing backed. No funding info

There are several seriously flawed reports posted on 21Wire by Vanessa Beeley, she is not a real journo nor investigative reporter, one trip to #Palestine does not make one a #Geopolitical analyst. No qualifications in #Journalism refer to @oliviasolon piece in @guardian

Or, John Whitehead (Newsbud Author and producer): top constitutional attorney, Civil liberties (and Police State) expert, 30+ years experience, 30 years activism, multiple books, lecturer, independent and non partisan