on the contrary! Marx was for abolition of the commodity, of money, of ideology, the state (Kapital shows their inner relation to capitalism); Bolshevism established state capitalism suited to modernizing Russia, preparing for war vs. Germany but treated Marx's work as ideology.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
huh? no i didn't say that at all. the proletariat is the universal class of the dispossessed which is only fully realized under the real domination of capital
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
1 forgive me for saying so, but you don't appear to have read Marx carefully at all. maybe a quotation will lead you to question some fixed ideas: Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We...
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Cukullen @QuixotesHorse and
2 call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
no, Marx was a true communist--as the passage from the German Ideology indicates. but communism is not an ideology--it is the opposite of ideology
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
