Terms like “anteater” and “uncircumcised” are derogatory terms for boys and men with anatomically correct genitalia. They are comparable to words like “beaver” and “cunt” and ought to be reportable to Twitter and other social media. Thoughts?
-
-
Replying to @Joseph4GI
promoting censorship takes away from your credibility
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen
I guess in your eyes we should be able to use words like ch!nks, n!g—s, k!kes, Jvps and gøøks to refer to entire ethnicities we don’t like?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Joseph4GI
in my eyes--and ears--speech reflects on the speaker. those who want to compel obedience have little credibility in rational discussion.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen
So you’re OK with people using slurs against others openly, just so we’re clear. I guess to you “having” to respect others as human beings is “compelling” obedience? What does dismissing an entire race, gender etc. have to do with “rational discussion?”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Joseph4GI @Cukullen
Are you saying you can’t have “rational discussion” with me unless you can call me an uncircumcised goy anteater?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
i try not to call people names; for me censorship, like circumcision, is an issue of personal autonomy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
