Idiot. The UK has no right to block a tanker to Syria. The only EU sanctions that ever existed were on airplane fuel and to Banias. It was a provocation and an act of piracy plain and simple.
-
-
Replying to @herinacius0 @ejmalrai
If that is true, then Iran's lawyers would have gotten the case dismissed by now. So you are not accurate.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Kenneth you cannot possibly be that ingenuous.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
There are about 16,00 Barristers in England and Wales, with London only a 3 hour flight to Gibraltar. Maybe Iran needs to hire better lawyers ?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
that must be it, all that's needed is better lawyers. Her Majesty's Realm dispenses nothing but justice, as humanity has learned over centuries.
@crimesofbrits@Rasputinish2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @herinacius0 and
There is Due Process. There would have been an Order/Writ for the Seizure and a Warrant Issued. A Show Cause Hearing could be requested by the Owners to contest the Order and the Warrant.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
In reality there was a request/order from Washington, to give an answer to the downed drone.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @herinacius0 @Cukullen and
No, that's just Pure Speculation. In reality it is a Legal Dispute that will be resolved in the Courts, unless Iran takes FM Jeremy Hunt's generous offer and guarantees that the ship will not be going to Syria.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
What a moron. Legal dispute when special forces were flown from UK to seize a tanker "on suspicion" it was headed for a certain country, citing sanctions that the EU has since pointed out did not apply - something the other hypocrites knew just as well as you.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @herinacius0 @Cukullen and
The next Hearing will be Friday as that is when the current Detention Order expires. Although Zarif will likely take FM Hunt's offer before then. It would be bad for Iran to fail to settle, as the next step may be a Forfeiture Action against the $170 million ship & cargo.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Brits have no right, legally or otherwise, to dictate destination of Iranian cargo, nor to deprive Syria of oil. Brits have been supporting al Qaeda & other terrorist groups vs legitimate govt of Syria for almost a decade--talk of legality is out of place here.
-
-
Replying to @Cukullen @herinacius0 and
As we have been discussing, whether or not UK has the right to detain the Grace 1 is a Legal Dispute that will be decided in the UK Courts, which have been deciding trade issues for hundreds of years. Probably a bad idea for Iran as a party to litigation to be making threats.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
One of Iran's big complaints before Trump pulled out of JCPOA is that there was not the enough expected Foreign Investment in Iran that Iran had hoped for. It will take $$$ hundreds of billions perhaps $$$ trillions to improve Iran economy, but Iran has to obey the rules.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
