Cú Chulainn

Well I whole heartedly agree with you. My mistake on thinking you were in support of genital cutting. I just view sexuality differently than you do. Every human adult has a sexuality. Asexuality is even a sexual identity, right? Albeit void of sexual feelings.

Sexual identity=/=sexuality. Also, babies don't have sexuality because they don't have sexual urges or experience (ideally). Thanks for your anticirc agreement, but you're still rude AF and rather suspect around young children. Are you a "MAP"er?

https://twitter.com/Cukullen/status/1029904393515229185 …

Right, wanting to limit sexual functioning is the point of this practice I'm used to cutters throwing out ad hominem pedophilia insults, but it's disappointing that an anti circer would do that. It's an obvious fact that circ impacts the sexual functioning of cut individuals.

by always bringing in adult sexual function. we fall into the trap of the child molesters/"circumcisers" the point is, this is no way to treat a baby. sexual damage is only one of the many ways children are harmed by this deliberate traumahttps://twitter.com/Cukullen/status/1092066600252071936 …

I respect your viewpoint fully. Harming children is wrong. However, the reason this practice exists is to suppress sexual functioning. This is not a perverse topic. In fact, I think the impact on sexual functioning should be spoken about more often. IMO

obviously circumcision attacks a man's sexuality in the first moment's of life. but it is also a deliberate trauma with many other negative effects. the greatest authorities in the Jewish tradition recognize that this is a deliberate harm to childrenhttps://twitter.com/dkingpower7/status/1095478877722501121 …

How do you explain that a procedure invented in patriarchal societies(in fact male-supremacist societies) was done for centuries to “attack male sexuality”, knowing that masculinity including male sexuality, was the supreme value in those societies?