No dear. The male babies who are circumcised in the US and all other parts of the 
come from families who love them and treasure their lives&sexuality. They wouldn’t anything to endanger their sons’ sexual pleasure or health later in life. So who are you trying to convince?
-
I respect your viewpoint fully. Harming children is wrong. However, the reason this practice exists is to suppress sexual functioning. This is not a perverse topic. In fact, I think the impact on sexual functioning should be spoken about more often. IMO
I'm used to cutters throwing out ad hominem pedophilia insults, but it's disappointing that an anti circer would do that. It's an obvious fact that circ impacts the sexual functioning of cut individuals.obviously circumcision attacks a man's sexuality in the first moment's of life. but it is also a deliberate trauma with many other negative effects. the greatest authorities in the Jewish tradition recognize that this is a deliberate harm to childrenhttps://twitter.com/dkingpower7/status/1095478877722501121 …
-
-
How do you explain that a procedure invented in patriarchal societies(in fact male-supremacist societies) was done for centuries to “attack male sexuality”, knowing that masculinity including male sexuality, was the supreme value in those societies?
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.