You’re a fucking liar when you say doctors worldwide don’t approve to circumcision. They don’t recommend it as a ROUTINE procedure, which is very different than not approving it. You are too stupid to comprehend.
-
-
Replying to @JenLast2 @redpillPA and
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Cú Chulainn
why do so many USA American women want to hurt baby boys in the worst way they can?https://twitter.com/Cukullen/status/1028835997851836418 …
Cú Chulainn added,
Cú Chulainn @CukullenUSA physicians are witch doctors--witness support of AAP, ACOG, AMA for genital mutilation of infant boys. German Pediatric Assoc: "AAP statement graded by almost all other paediatric societies & associations worldwide as being scientifically untenable." http://www.intactamerica.org/german_pediatrics_statement …Show this thread1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @redpillPA and
Lame conspiracy theory. It won’t stand scrutiny. In fact American women who circumcise their sons do so out of love. And because their circumcised fathers insist on it! Analgesics reduce pain to the minimum in infants.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JenLast2 @_MidnightVixen_ and
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Elijah J. Magnier
now i understand--these USA women who circumcise their sons love them like
@realDonaldTrump loves Iranians--so much they want to obliterate them!!https://twitter.com/ejmalrai/status/1143617825107566595 …Cú Chulainn added,
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @redpillPA and
No dear. The male babies who are circumcised in the US and all other parts of the
come from families who love them and treasure their lives&sexuality. They wouldn’t anything to endanger their sons’ sexual pleasure or health later in life. So who are you trying to convince?6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Babies don't HAVE sexuality. Why the fuck are you sexualizing the bodies of newborn boys?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @VPrince93 @JenLast2 and
Every adult was once a baby. Every human has sexuality. Wake up.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Jena_TL_Integ @JenLast2 and
First of all, asexuals exist. Second of all, babies are not inherently sexual beings. NO BABY should have surgery performed on THEIR bodies without THEIR consent. That should LITERALLY be the end of this discussion.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @VPrince93 @JenLast2 and
Well I whole heartedly agree with you. My mistake on thinking you were in support of genital cutting. I just view sexuality differently than you do. Every human adult has a sexuality. Asexuality is even a sexual identity, right? Albeit void of sexual feelings.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Sexual identity=/=sexuality. Also, babies don't have sexuality because they don't have sexual urges or experience (ideally). Thanks for your anticirc agreement, but you're still rude AF and rather suspect around young children. Are you a "MAP"er?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Cú Chulainn
Cú Chulainn added,
-
-
Replying to @Cukullen @VPrince93 and
Right, wanting to limit sexual functioning is the point of this practice
I'm used to cutters throwing out ad hominem pedophilia insults, but it's disappointing that an anti circer would do that. It's an obvious fact that circ impacts the sexual functioning of cut individuals.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
