Cú Chulainn

No. Removing any part of the female genitals has detrimental to sex life.Studies show that circumcised men do not have any reduced sexual function whatsoever.Dude!Do you really think that billions of men on this planet would undergo the most popular surgery ever if that happened?

You don’t get it do you. You aren’t fighting me, you have a huge uphill battle in convincing both the medical community and the vast majority of men on the planet who are circumcised, love it,and would just tell you to fuck off if you try to portray them as victims of conspiracy.

Outside the Muslim world only about 10% of the worlds men are circumcised, and most of those men are in the US. So you're wrong about most of the medical field approving of circumcision. BTW circumcision is quickly losing favor here.

Ok. I will leave “poor oppressed” American men to sort this out by themselves. I’m sure they don’t need Catholics to moralize them on the importance of the prepuce. The only problem here is that misogynists use circumcision to trivialize fgm. There is no comparison . That’s all.

Is FGM worse? Yes, in most cases, but to act like there is no comparison is just ridiculous. Mutilation is mutilation no matter the severity.

No it’s not mutilation. Mutilation means doing damage to a body part. How can you say it’s mutilation when there is no damage? Not only is there no damage, but there are potentially important health benefits.Explain that.