that's the prevailing euphemism
-
-
Circumcision has health benefits.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes, but only in the "medicine" practiced in the USA and in jewish folklore
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Incorrect. Physicians worldwide acknowledge that there are health, and other, benefits to circumcision.
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @scragsma70 @Cukullen and
Not only is what you said categorically untrue, but even if it *was,* then by admitting that circumcision's alleged health benefits are legitimate reasons to do it, you necessarily have to allow for research to be done into infant female circumcision to look for parallels.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JellyfishRave @Cukullen and
Don't be daft. Not in ANY way equivalent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JellyfishRave @scragsma70 and
Tell me why it should? We have our own laws and they have nothing to do with another country's religion.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bones_zoom @JellyfishRave and
US practices have everything to do with Judaism, which you apparently consider to be the USA religion. USA & Israel are the only countries that routinely mutilate newborn boys, and the form of mutilation is strictly rabbinical, introduced ca. 200 AD:https://www.littleimages.org/drawing-ot-milah-circumcision-vs-modern-periah/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cukullen @Bones_zoom and
False. Male circumcision was common all over the Middle East as far back as ancient Egypt. The Judaic tradition traces to the patriarch Abraham, whom historians place no later than the 6th century BC, possibly as far back as 2000 BC. Claiming introduction ca 200 AD is laughable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
it is embarrassing for you to parade your ignorance in this way. all jewish sources recognize the change to Periah from Milah circumcision in this period. placing Abraham in the 6th century BC is absurd even by a literalist, fundamentalist reading of OThttps://www.i2researchhub.org/articles/brit-milah-a-study-of-change-in-custom/ …
-
-
Replying to @Cukullen @Bones_zoom and
I can't answer for why historians place Abraham as having lived some time between 2000 BC and 600 BC. But that's what they have determined.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
