We OB/GYNs say we have two patients. The mother AND the baby. How can a baby be our patient if it isn’t alive - if it’s just a clump of cells? It is a human. It is a life. We are just as ethically bound to protect it as we are take the life of the mother.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @OmarHamada
in USA OB/GYNs perform most genital mutilations of newborn boys--that's how much they care for this "patient" born with the diagnosis "male"
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
-
-
Circumcision has health benefits.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes, but only in the "medicine" practiced in the USA and in jewish folklore
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Incorrect. Physicians worldwide acknowledge that there are health, and other, benefits to circumcision.
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @scragsma70 @Cukullen and
Not only is what you said categorically untrue, but even if it *was,* then by admitting that circumcision's alleged health benefits are legitimate reasons to do it, you necessarily have to allow for research to be done into infant female circumcision to look for parallels.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JellyfishRave @Cukullen and
Don't be daft. Not in ANY way equivalent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Brian D. Earp
read this and then tell us whyhttps://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1080961739276062720 …
Cú Chulainn added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
