Cú Chulainn

rationalizing the sexual mutilation of little boys is more than weird. at least Muslims have the decency to wait until boys have some defenses. i'm opposed to all forms of mutilation. but you want to defend the sexual abuse & mutilation of baby boys by pointing finger at Muslims

That's not at all the case, there are historical reasons why jewish people were more resistant to diseases, but circumcision is not one of them, unfortunately 200 years ago they thought it was. in 2014 an US study found twice the rate of cancer causing HPV on circumcised men >>

2> compared to intact men, in 2011 a study in Puerto Rico found 11.7% more STIs across the board in circumcised men over intact men, the USA has the highest rate of RIC in the developed world and also the highest rate for pretty much every STI. At best it's worthless protection>>

3> at worst, and much more likely, circumcision increases the risk of contracting STIs.

How

The foreskin, among other things, functions as a mechanical lubricant, the shaft slides inside the skin, the skin mostly staying put. When the slack skin is removed the skin slides against his partner, causing friction which can cause abrasions, small tears that let viruses in.