Cú Chulainn

Change my view... circumcision is rarely ever ACTUALLY needed in rare medical instances, otherwise its mostly ever done preemptively just for "looks". I haven't seen enough evidence to suggest most circumcisions needed to be done or couldn't have been avoided.

Setting the other side up to lose a debate. Clever!

thanks. its bullet proof logic! I don't see how circ rates are so rampant in US because of "medical reasons" when in other countries they are not and maybe only less than 10% HAD to have it done? if that...

Medically necessary circumcision is so rare. Most instances in the US are due to phimosis (treatable without circ AND rare) and "infection," which is generally down to improper care. That shouldn't be! Where circumcision isn't a norm, the medical and cosmetic prevalence is 1-4%