How about under the clitoral hood? Why don't we cut off their prepuce and expose the clitoris for the same reason we expose the glans in males? It'd keep things in there all nice and dried out and desensitized, which y'all seem to think is a good thing for some reason.
-
-
Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and
How would you know that? lol. Have there been studies on it?
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and
The clit hood can get infected. Surgery isn't done for this condition.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and
First of all, we don't know if removing the labia would reduce female UTI rates. But we consider it unethical to study that. That's sexism. Also, my example wasn't UTI, but clit hood infection.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and
Two key points here you are missing: in this case the female cutting was therapeutic. Also, it was consensual. RIC is never consensual and never therapeutic. If male circ is therapeutic and ALL OTHER OPTIONS EXHAUSTED, then I'm OK with it. I doubt it's ever truly necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dlindenii @_Undersized_ and
Oh it can be, but the numbers, from what I understand are about 1 in 16,000. Just 0.00006% of men will need circumcision for a medical reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
16,700 (Finland stats)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
