Cú Chulainn

I was addressing a religious point. Dolt.

No he was citing Jewish literature that admits our point, that circumcision damaged a man sexually, intentionally, that it is an excision of the pleasures of the flesh to bring a man closer to their god. Or at least that's what I read into it, @Cukullen could confirm or deny that

Which is a religious point.

Which is religion admitting what you have been protesting, that circumcision damages sexual pleasure. That it was intended to damage this. We can go back to Philo Judaeus in the first century AD, or Moses Maimonides in the 12th century, or even to dozens of doctors in the >>

is it possible that the mitzvot serves as a cloak for darker impulses? sexual mutilation of infant boys is often the conspiracy of a predatory doctor/mohel, a castrating mother, and an impotent father

None of God’s laws can have a ‘darker impulse’.