It’s not a problem for anyone. It’s only a problem for you because you’re making t a problem.
-
-
Replying to @alimcnabb @Gregory_Malchuk and
might be a good for you to learn something about the subject before opining. Dr Glick's book is a good start http://www.intactamerica.org/glick
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @Gregory_Malchuk and
Or, alternatively, I could spend my time doing something useful.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alimcnabb @Cukullen and
Have your pick, Ali.pic.twitter.com/2STlsLR8sb
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dkingpower7 @Cukullen and
I pick none of the above, because none of them apply.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alimcnabb @dkingpower7 and
As long as any surgery no matter how slight to a girls genitals is a felony yet cutting off half the skin of a boys is normal, the third one definitely applies. Circ is designed to lessen the sexual sensitivity of the penis, that's why it was done, there's #4
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @dkingpower7 and
Except that’s not settled science at all.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alimcnabb @dkingpower7 and
No I saw your source from a psychology journal, first psychology is not the right science to measure physical pleasure, and second, there are alot of subjective arguments in that article. just because you can enjoy sex without a foreskin does not mean it should be removed.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @dkingpower7 and
Your argument, unless I’m mistaken, is that circumcision hampers sexual satisfaction. If circumcised men, especially those who underwent the procedure as adults, don’t think so, I think that means something.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
why did you do it?
5:52 PM - 30 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.