Cú Chulainn

No he was citing Jewish literature that admits our point, that circumcision damaged a man sexually, intentionally, that it is an excision of the pleasures of the flesh to bring a man closer to their god. Or at least that's what I read into it, @Cukullen could confirm or deny that

Which is a religious point.

Which is religion admitting what you have been protesting, that circumcision damages sexual pleasure. That it was intended to damage this. We can go back to Philo Judaeus in the first century AD, or Moses Maimonides in the 12th century, or even to dozens of doctors in the >>

you say that you are not making a religious arguments; do you mean to defend the practice on any grounds but religious ones?https://twitter.com/alijayne_mcnabb/status/1046493106319872005 …

When I say I am not making a religious argument, I mean I will not cite to the Torah. Not that I oppose the covenant. I don’t.

ok, i can accept your religious conviction as such. but the issue is your claim to inflict/support the infliction of this belief on children, with catastrophic consequences for their health and well-being.

I disagree with your premise.