Cú Chulainn

I pick none of the above, because none of them apply.

As long as any surgery no matter how slight to a girls genitals is a felony yet cutting off half the skin of a boys is normal, the third one definitely applies. Circ is designed to lessen the sexual sensitivity of the penis, that's why it was done, there's #4

Except that’s not settled science at all.

No I saw your source from a psychology journal, first psychology is not the right science to measure physical pleasure, and second, there are alot of subjective arguments in that article. just because you can enjoy sex without a foreskin does not mean it should be removed.

Your argument, unless I’m mistaken, is that circumcision hampers sexual satisfaction. If circumcised men, especially those who underwent the procedure as adults, don’t think so, I think that means something.

that is but one of many arguments against infantile sexual mutilation--the lifetime mental trauma is not an accidental but a deliberate outcome of this procedure, as the jewish literature explicitly attests