16. At no point during can Russia be accused of moving the goalposts. There is enough proof showing that the residents WANTED the Syrian Army to liberate them, and that Al Qaeda was indeed holding them hostage. However, France’s stated aims are not consistent at all.
-
Show this thread
-
17. They said that Russia/Assad was massacring innocent civilians who were resisting the “regime”. So why has France just worked with the “monster” Russia to deliver aid to the same town (Ghouta) that Russia was apparently wrongly bombing and “annexing”?
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
18. If what France was saying in the past was correct, then it is simply unimaginable that such cooperation could happen! Russia is the enemy, after all, that massacres people like Hitler did! The French media repeated this thesis non-stop, on TV and in the newspapers.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
19. The very fact that France made this joint delivery of humanitarian aid PROVES that the fairytale about the “brave, democratic rebels” resisting the “butcher” Assad was a pack of lies. Otherwise, why doesn’t French media go to the area now and question the residents?
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
20. If Russia really was the “monster” that the French media depicted it to be for the entire Syrian war, then what does this make Macron, who now cooperates with this “monster”? Putin’s hands are, allegedly, elbow-deep in blood, so how can Macron even speak to Moscow?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
21. The truth: once the jihadists were removed, France had to drop the Ghouta topic like a hot potato. And now France tries to “tie up loose ends” by almost pretending that France was on Russia’s side this entire time. Ofc, the uninformed layperson will swallow this.
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
22. The most alarming thing in all of this is how easy it is to dupe a nation. The average man in the street is too busy with selfies and celebrating the World Cup victory (in "evil" Russia!) to even do basic maths or to care about things that directly affect their lives.
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
23. I am very very interested to see how the MSM presents the upcoming Idlib operation. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them abandon their precious “moderate” buddies and to continue to caress the Russian bear, since the Syrian war is now over and the EU needs Eurasian money
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
24. Syria will have the last laugh anyway, as the quality of life in France plunges and plunges. The White Helmets were evacuated and will probably come to France and drain the welfare budget. The boomerang always returns to sender. The Ukrainian one is fast approaching.
1 reply 3 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Ollie Richardson Retweeted Ollie Richardson
25. I will end this thread by connecting it to an earlier tweet: the reason why France is worried about Russian State media's popularity is because if people start reading a different perspective of the Syrian war, Élysée Palace will be in deep sh*t.https://twitter.com/O_Rich_/status/1020965616902189056 …
Ollie Richardson added,
Ollie Richardson @O_Rich_Today’s@le_Parisien features an article that calls@RT_com and@SputnikInt “deranged”. The very fact that they dedicated an article to Russian state media, essentially saying “don’t watch these channels, trust only the MSM”, is indicative in itself. I.e., they are very afraid. pic.twitter.com/TSvVtK6cor2 replies 5 retweets 14 likesShow this thread
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Cú Chulainn
French aid to Syria needs to be framed in the context of reparations for NATO crimes against Syria, and not as humanitarian help aimed at embellishing France's tarnished name brandhttps://twitter.com/Cukullen/status/1020741520356528134 …
Cú Chulainn added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
