Here "Global Elite" is nothing more than a crude synonym for "International Jewry", and the typical European chauvinist's attempt to shield "one's own elite".https://twitter.com/alessabocchi/status/1008289619765547008 …
-
Show this thread
-
Phil Greaves Retweeted Alessandra
Marx did not ever "write against immigration", but the capitalist manipulation & exploitation of the working class on a global scale. Also the link you provide is actually written by Engels, & completely irrelevant, but carry on...https://twitter.com/alessabocchi/status/1008314242922090503 …
Phil Greaves added,
Alessandra @alessabocchiWhen Marxist-Leninists practice mental gymnastics to justify why they’re actually on the side of the capitalist ruling class. Little do they know Marx would disavow them immediately since he wrote against immigration, something they have yet to reply to. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/condition-working-class/ch06.htm … https://twitter.com/philgreaves01/status/1008312902284120064 …1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01
Engels reference is indeed relevant to Marx's discussion of the reserve army of capital. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch25.htm …
@alessabocchi1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cukullen @alessabocchi
Phil Greaves Retweeted Phil Greaves
Its not relevant to our discussion, only in that Marx & Engels position on the surplus army marries mine wrt immigration in Europe, in direct contradistinction to European nationalists like these Berlusconi creeps.https://twitter.com/PhilGreaves01/status/902888035376881664 …
Phil Greaves added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @alessabocchi
Marx in no way supports immigration--he recognizes capital's reserve army as a tool to divide the proletariat. globalized capital is destroying the nation-state, as the nation-state replaced local economies with national markets. it is natural but futile that people oppose this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @alessabocchi
What a dickish remark. Marx advocated the eventual abolition of nations you utter moron, thus his problem was not migration per se, but the capitalist mode of production & the capitalist classes exploitation of both migrant & domestic labour.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @alessabocchi
Cú Chulainn Retweeted Cú Chulainn
Marx did not advocate abolition of nations but of states and, more basically, of the commodity and all its retinue--money, religion, politics etc. Bolshevist state-capitalism radicalized the tradition of Social Democracy which Marx opposedhttps://twitter.com/Cukullen/status/948320395400269825 …
Cú Chulainn added,
Cú Chulainn @Cukullenhe spent his final years fighting the marxists (Critique of Gotha Program); there are several citations, e.g. re. the French, Engels to Bernstein Nov 2-3, 1882: "Marx once said to Lafargue: ‘Ce qu'il y a de certain c'est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste.’" http://marxists.catbull.com/archive/marx/works/1882/letters/82_11_02.htm …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cukullen @alessabocchi
"Money, religion---the nation, etc". You talk a lot of waffle, but not much else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Marx begins _Capital_ with the analysis of commodity fetishism because exchange begins the process of political economy--the maximalist communist program has always been abolition not just of capital but of all it implies. your disagreement is with Marx.
-
-
Replying to @Cukullen @alessabocchi
Again, just high-falutin waffle. Does "all it imply" include the nation? Or do you think nations are "essential" or "natural" things?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
