The concern @petertoddbtc cites is nothing short of idiotic, as it will never affect Teechan. Someone who read the protocol would know this.
-
-
Replying to @el33th4xor @petertoddbtc
We knew from Peter's attempted and failed hit piece on Ripple that he will miss the real issues and latch onto trivialities.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @el33th4xor @petertoddbtc
Can the troll squad please produce a slightly more intelligent attack dog?
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @el33th4xor @petertoddbtc
you're both very clever chaps & admired by many - perhaps work together to make Teechan even better?
4 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @alistairmilne @el33th4xor
I'd prefer not to work with dishonest people; the way Teechan has been portrayed has been dishonest IMO.
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
So much of the PR for it has completely glossed over the difficulty of getting it into production.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Sorry to see you feeling so threatened by a research project Peter.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Cornell/Imperial aren't startups. We have no legal framework for distributing production software that can potentially lose money.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Teechan is a protocol, not a product. Do you understand what this even means?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
You have tried every single dumb avenue to smear the approach. Your position was clear from the getgo, you're trying to backfill the reason.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
guyz, big respect for both but this is stupid. Twitter is not the medium for this. Write some blog or whatever
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.