Cristiana Santos

@Cristianapt

AI&Law, Legal Knowledge Representation for legal compliance in: privacy & data protection, and consumer law. I also address legal aspects of AI in Space Law

Netherlands
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Cristianapt

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Cristianapt

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    23. sij

    [THREAD] With @NataliiaBielova we define 17 legal & technical requirements on for to be compliant with , directive and case-law. We assess when and whether verification of per requirement is technically feasible

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Just out! "The Force Awakens: Artificial Intelligence for Consumer Law" Perks: 1) Star Wars title 2) A plan for how AI can be used to help enforce consumer rights; 3) Awesome journal & co-authors et al

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    New Commission study on "Scams and fraud experienced by consumers" covering offline and online practices, which could be EU consumer law breaches or even criminal offences. Alarming survey results and estimations of financial detriment:

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    My colleague from is explaining how hundreds of adtech companies are harvesting massive amounts of personal data through our apps. Systemic issues that affect the entire industry.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Check out our recent work -- with strong legal analysis and technical analysis -- on consent requirements for cookie banners!

    Poništi
  6. 23. sij

    Finally, can consent be shared among publishers? No. One exception: if the consent is ‘negative’, e.g. refuses all types of purposes and tracking technologies (see section 5 of our paper) Full paper draft 👉

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 23. sij

    ⚠️10 out of 17 requirements can be verified only manually: it is time-consuming and doesn't scale. Our conclusion: the legislator should propose standardized and machine-readable specification of purposes for tracking technologies for automatic analysis at scale.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 23. sij

    ☑️ Delete ‘consent cookie’ and communicate to third parties: when consent is revoked, the publisher should delete the ‘consent cookie’ and communicate the withdrawal to all the third parties who have previously received consent.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 23. sij

    ☑️Possible to change in the future: the website should give an opportunity to withdraw consent after it has been given at any time. Violation: it is not possible to withdraw by the same means it was asked, e.g. delays or complex ways to revoke.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 23. sij

    ☑️ No consent walls: the website needs to be accessible even if the user didn’t respond to the consent request. If there are other ways to show the banner without blocking or disturbing the access to the service, then it's preferred over a consent wall Example of a violation ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 23. sij

    ☑️ Correct consent registration: registered consent must be identical to the user’s choice of consent in user interface. Example of a violation from our previous work ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 23. sij

    In our previous work, we have automatically detected violations of "Post-consent registration" requirement: Example of a violation from our previous work ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 23. sij

    ☑️Post-consent registration: consent is registered (e.g. stored on a terminal equipment) in a ‘consent cookie’ (or any other browser storage) only after an affirmative action of the user.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 23. sij

    ☑️Configurable banner: a cookie banner must give the user an option to customize her consent. We argue that the choice between ‘accept’ and ‘reject’ must be balanced.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    ☑️Affirmative Action Design: consent must be registered only after an affirmative action of a user. Violations: user closes the banner and positive consent is registered; pre-ticked boxes; disappearance of the banner with a positive consent registered Example of a violation⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 23. sij

    ☑️Separate consent per purpose: consent should be separately requested for each purpose. We also argue that consent request is not required per cookie, per publisher, not per third party. Example of a violation ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 23. sij

    Example of a violation: “Deny permission” button leads to a much reduced version of the website: only 10 pages are accessible, pre-selected by the website (and not articles requested by the user) ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 23. sij

    ☑️No tracking wall: blocking access to a website unless the user gives a positive consent, is not a valid consent. The existence of a tracking wall for cookies that require consent might violate a free consent.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 23. sij

    ☑️Prior Consent: 🔘Prior to setting cookies: consent must be obtained before cookies are set 🔘Prior to sending cookies: consent must be obtained before cookies are sent (before the request for content that sends such cookies is sent). Example of a violation ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 23. sij

    Most interesting of the 1⃣7⃣ requirements on & for with examples of violations observed on websites ⬇️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 23. sij

    We first analyze case-law, EDPB, EDPS and DPAs’ guidelines to establish which purposes require consent and scope our work around for tracking technologies used for such purposes (Table 1 of our paper). Full paper draft 👉

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·