Lorraine

@CrimsonGash

SAHM, kind and benevolent dictator

Ventura California
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @CrimsonGash

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @CrimsonGash

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    the squad when nyt updates the needle to show bernie in the lead

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 3 sata

    gonna be awesome when we get to nevada and the dnc is still refusing to let iowa announce a winner

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    oh wow gloves off

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata

    Pete went on stage, claimed an unearned victory, media ran with it for an entire week leading to an uptick in media coverage, donations & polling numbers for Pete then at the 11th hour when it looks like Sanders actually won, the DNC steps in to delay it even more. Incredible.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata

    There is a .1% difference between Pete & Bernie now. Woodbury County has 3 precincts still unreported. Pete is in 3rd there. Polk County still has 6 precincts unreported. The Chair of the Polk County Dems tweeted they had submitted all their results to IA Dem HQ on Tuesday.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is a good graphic. What I like most about it is that Bernie won Iowa because he got more votes.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    not an unfair description of what is happening: a bunch of non-white Iowans put Bernie over the top and now Buttigieg and the DNC are questioning how much their votes should matter

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    To every supporter who donated, knocked on doors, made phone calls, sent texts, made the Bernie Journey, drove people to their caucus sites, recruited precinct captains, answered questions on the helpdesk, or otherwise volunteered for Bernie: you did this. You won Iowa. Thank you

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    If this was 's actual reason this is nothing other than corrupt. I reported yesterday that the satellite caucuses could make the difference for Sanders. This didn't come out of nowhere. To order a re-canvass because Sanders surged at satellites is staggering. Get over it

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Watch this and then consider that the Buttigieg campaign, which spent zero effort to organize or inspire these folks, is now spending its energy lobbying party officials to diminish the influence they have on the outcome.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Democratic Party: We need to inspire more people to vote for us Democratic Party: Not like this

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Question: Mayor Pete's been declaring a win for days now, why should people believe your victory speech over his? Bernie: Because I got 6,000 more votes, and from where I come from when you get 6,000 more votes that's generally regarded to be the winner

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I've got an even better idea. DONATE TO ON BEHALF OF NEOCON JEN, TOM PEREZ, RAT FINK PETE AND THE ENTIRE DNC.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima

    must immediately be removed from head of the - he has absolutely no semblance of impartiality.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Changing the rules in the middle of an election sounds exactly like Tom Perez.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Shows you where his head is at and what his priorities are. His #1 job is to stop bernie and he keeps tripping over his horrible political instincts. he’ll be receiving that generous severance package very soon

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    So, are we to understand that the DNC isn't happy with how many SDEs the satellites got? Would they be more comfortable if votes of the POC who caucused in those satellites are counted as 3/5 of a vote compared to the largely white caucusers' votes in the main caucus sites?

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is outrageous. Apparently Tom Perez isn’t concerned about tabulation errors. Instead, he’s mad that Bernie did so well in satellite caucuses and wants to change the rules midstream to make them count for fewer SDEs.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·