16 USC §§1372(a)(3), 1375 & 1362(6) make it a federal crime to possess a narwhal tusk, but not if it's for "enhancing the survival of a species."https://nypost.com/2019/11/29/hero-london-bridge-bystander-helped-stop-stabbing-suspect-with-narwhal-tusk/ …
-
-
Yet we have compelling evidence that the way to stop a bad guy [who might have had a narwhal tusk, who knew what might have been hidden in that vest before he was stopped] is a good guy with a narwhal tusk. The National Narwhal Association demands a constitutional amendment.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Lemme guess... WestlawNext search followed by PACER?
-
Cuz pulling an actual indictment on this is a big flex
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don't think US law applies in London. Just sayin'.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Oddly enough, Maine represents.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They were trying to import Narwhal tusks in violation of US Federal law. I don't believe this is the same as using a Narwhal tusk as a defensive weapon on the London Bridge in the UK.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I have rights! I have rights!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.