Why is this being debated? Statistically, those under 30 were practically invincible. There is a strong argument those under 65 don’t need it. Enough with the vax insanity.
Is the Pfizer mRNA 
better or worse than the Astrazeneca for young men ?
Are these rates of Myocarditis worth it for a strain with a lower CFR than the flu ?
Why aren’t our incompetent health bureaucrats providing the data so people can make an informed decision ?pic.twitter.com/hWsrb0PiAq
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is someone supposed to make an informed decision, when the main active ingredient in the mRNA isn’t disclosed? Which synthetic amino acid is the mRNA? Why is there no chemical name or formula listed? Could it be that it’s carcinogenic like the others?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.