The paper you have linked seems to be a literature review of 24 existing studies which I assume have already been considered & discounted by the wider medical community? One day a 'game over' paper may be published, but I don't think this is it. However I can admit I’m no expert.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please stop presenting reviews of reviews, all of which have already been debunked, as if it were some earth shattering new information. If you say it often enough, it still isn't true!
-
You clearly don't understand the peer review process!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Published by an informatics company, not exactly the Journal of the American Medical Association is it? Could I suggest the member for Hughes actually post something higher than base metal standard for a change?
-
Crowd-funded in order to publish, all affiliates of organisations already heavily biased about Ivermectin and anti-vax. No surprises here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No money for big pharma in IVM
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still no mention in the media about this.
#FollowTheSilence Absolutely shamefulThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Greatest crime in history?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm no "denier" - Ivermectin is an effective anti-parasitic agent. It's the data on Ivermectin for COVID that is not solid. No denying that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.