Quite obviously!
ARE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS SUPPRESSING THE EVIDENCE ON IVERMECTIN? While a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has found 21 #Ivermectin studies to review with 2,741 people, Australia’s National Covid Evidence Taskforce have only looked at 10 studies with 800 people. Why?pic.twitter.com/1VkyPoJOBO
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not long to the next election....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
please take some, and let us know what happens.
-
Ivermectin? I've been taking it for months now as a prophylaxis and all the doctors I know of who are trying to get the authorities to see the error of their way wrt ivermectin is also take it regularly. I have no side effects to report.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
thought twitter was beneath you craig
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#VitaminD,#VitaminC,#zinc &#Quercetin r more useful,with no side effects in proper dosage,available over-the-counter,& relatively low cost,but the#Medical#Establishment is biased & ignorant towards any natural therapies so they too r suppressed.#Auspol#COVID19#coronavirus -
@viralvideovlogs@DenierLevel5 Thanks for your retweets. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Follow the money
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same here in the Philippines. Cherry picked data to suit their narrativepic.twitter.com/6HCi4E3fLy
-
And the worst they could do from their cherry picking still shows significant benefit (although high CI). Their statement and their statistics do not match up.pic.twitter.com/rd26TeoF9A
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.