You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There are 42 published studies into Ivermectin’s efficacy re Covid, involving 14,906 patients https://c19ivermectin.com The National Covid Evidence Taskforce have looked at ONLY 7studies with 508 patients To claim they ‘’rapidly update the National guidelines’’ is FAKE NEWS.pic.twitter.com/LtaxmubI8n
The same in most countries, they only cherry picked a handful of studies and even all of those studies show ivermectin works. The Journal of Antibiotics write as follows: https://twitter.com/CundillScotty/status/1365681891576147968 …
But not for Covid-19
It's not really about IVM or HCQ, Craig, they want to get mRNA and nanos into us yesterday.
Why would they want to do that (whatever they are)?
That's risky using such a heading Craig. The Twitter algorithm's watching you 
I’m really pleased you are getting this out @CraigKellyMP - you should also push to get Medicare rebates for furniture salespersons too - then we can buy a couch and get a medical consultation at the same time
I'm going out on a limb. I'm going to say thanks, Craig. You are proiding the light relief we need in these troubled times. SONTARI HAI!pic.twitter.com/QWk7AsfTSn
@CraigKellyMP - How many of the 42 studies involved randomised controlled trials?
21 are. And with the data to hand, any further trial that denies a sick person Ivermectin and instead might give them a placebo (putting their life at risk) - is immoral and unethical.pic.twitter.com/0ExaK5M0rn
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
