There's a lot of advice out there, triggered by my tweet, that it's OK to say no. You can listen to that advice, but be warned that one of the key criterion a junior faculty is judged by is their presence in the national/international scientific community (1/2)
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
A major aspect of that presence is being on editorial boards. That doesn't happen if you say no to editors. Moreover, those same people are scoring your own papers and grants. Think twice before saying "no" to them (2/2)
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
FWIW, this is exactly what I did when I was starting out as faculty. It was more work, but it ended up greatly enhancing my own papers, grants, and overall career. Respectful disagreements are always welcome. But there's no need for abuse, mockery, or profanity.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I am trying to do this, however even though I notified journals that I would be unavailable these 2 weeks they still sent me manuscripts. Sometimes I feel they are taking most of my time and my research time is being affected. I understand your point but there should be a limit.
-
Don't forget that reading papers in your own area of research is a valid way to spend your research time. I always find it best to set a specific limit to the number I accept (two per month) and stick rigidly to that whatever journal the third request comes from.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
LOL. 1) I get asked to review several manuscripts per week. I would not have time to actually get anything else done if I said yes to them all. 2) Performing anonymous publication peer review has got to be one of the worst ways to get noticed. That's not the reason to do it.
-
Wow. Someone doesn't like dissenting opinions!pic.twitter.com/LBctpe3hST
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
My advice would be the opposite, especially for junior faculty: be extremely selective on the manuscripts you review - otherwise it will take precious time out of your two main goals: i) corresponding author papers and ii) PI grants
-
Sigh... the problem with academia right here. When did you forget your main goal is good research? When did it become perpetuating the system.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Disagree. Be very selective with your time. Reviewing papers will not have you noticed by senior faculty and even if it did they don’t care about your reviewing, only your science and mentoring
-
I’m here for the ratios
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.