There is no logic in this whatsoever. Anyone with malicious intent and a claiming tool could terminate pretty much any big YouTuber's channel. Understand: If you have 3 (three) videos on your channel that contain any copyrighted content in them whatsoever, you are at risk of...
-
Show this thread
-
...losing your channel. Copyright strikes and TOS strikes are two completely separate issues and grouping them together is utterly nonsensical
@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube1 reply 6 retweets 149 likesShow this thread -
If I wanted to, I could put a STRIKE (yes a STRIKE) on
@PewDiePie's channel. He's used my Auctioneer Beats content before in his videos. You need 3 (three) of these to terminate (TERMINATE) someone's channel. Fix your backwards system and protect your creators@TeamYouTube5 replies 9 retweets 161 likesShow this thread -
Unfortunately this is because of DMCA law which forces platforms to penalize and ban repeat infringers
4 replies 2 retweets 50 likes -
Do you have the documentation that sites this
1 reply 0 retweets 37 likes -
The DMCA law has a repeat infringer policy, I don't have the exact text of the law but if you google "DMCA repeat infringer policy" you'll get a lot of articles about it.
2 replies 1 retweet 53 likes -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act … Nowhere in law documentation does it state the number of times a ISP / platform has to decide on 3 strikes. Through everywhere I looked, it isn't defined anywhere and is up to the discretion of the platform. Why not make the limit 10 strikes?pic.twitter.com/NEwLDUVEyB
1 reply 0 retweets 25 likes -
Oh yeah it leaves it up to the platforms to come up with a "fair" policy. Still, whether it's 3 or 10 strikes, it has to be there. Platforms probably try to go with a smaller number to make sure they're on the safe side.
2 replies 0 retweets 34 likes -
Protecting creators = increasing the strike limit. If YouTube hasn't already made a case to do this, then my original tweet stands
1 reply 0 retweets 32 likes -
Sure, except according to the giant entertainment corporations it will mean "protecting copyright infringers", and will make YouTube more at risk of getting sued by them for billions.
2 replies 2 retweets 84 likes
YouTube generates the majority of these label's revenue, from music videos to streaming. YouTube video views are becoming the industry standard to measure success. They have a strong case to take back control from these oppressive companies, I think they should take it to court
-
-
Replying to @CowbellyTV @grandayy and
Dunno if you have seen this but this video by
@EmperorLemon explains the situation and what caused youtube to do this quite wellhttps://youtu.be/qV2h_KGno9w0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.